Is the Internet Killing the Artist?

Here is a pretty interesting read from Andrew Keen of the Telegraph. Although there is no real discussion of how this all relates to film, I'll consider the intelligence of our readers to draw their own comparisons. More after the jump.

"It’s bad news, I argued in my 2007 book Cult of the Amateur, a polemic which suggested that the Internet is killing our culture and undermining the livelihood of cultural producers. No, it’s good news, counter the techno-optimists like Jeff Jarvis and Clay Shirky - who argue that the Internet offers creative artists and organizations an opportunity to escape from the sometimes unjust and inefficient control of industrial age mass-media.

Today, more than two years after the publication of Cult of the Amateur, as the destructive pace of technological change in the media business has dramatically increased, the debate about the impact of the Internet on high cultural artists and organizations has also become more urgent. Today, as the old mass media industries of television, newspapers, book publishing, recorded music and movies are being fundamentally restructured by the digital economy, it’s become clear that the early 21st century digital revolution is having as profound an impact upon culture as the mid 19th century industrial revolution.

Indeed, the relationship between creativity and technology has become such an emotive issue today that a new international political movement, the Pirate Party, has emerged which actively supports the rights of both the cultural producer and consumer against big media conglomerates. Thus, in an interview earlier this month in The Telegraph, Pirate Party UK leader Andrew Robinson underlined his party’s commitment to reforming copyright law in the UK which, he claimed, adds to the “wealth of big business” rather than 'benefiting the artist.'"

For the full article, take a look for yourself HERE.